A shipping container’s side wall lined with 100mm of closed-cell spray foam (BASF Walltite, λ 0.025), taken at its thinnest point, then a battened service void and plasterboard, has a U-value of about 0.23 W/m²K — inside the 0.26 limiting value for a new dwelling; 125mm gives 0.19 and 50mm only 0.42. The steel adds almost nothing to the U-value: its part in the calculation is to be vapour-tight on the cold side, and that is why U-Monkey’s condensation check fails every version on this page insulated on the inside — 271 g/m² of condensate is still in the wall at the end of the year with the foam alone, about 30 g/m² with a polythene vapour control layer added — and passes the same container insulated on the outside, or inside behind a sealed foil vapour control layer about as tight as the steel.
Every layer editable · live U-value · Part L & Future Homes Standard targets · free PDF report
The build-up (outside → inside)
- 2mm corrugated Corten side panel (steel, λ 50): thermally negligible, vapour-tight
- 100mm closed-cell spray foam bonded to the steel, counted at its thinnest point (the trough air is not counted)
- 25mm service void on battens (11.8% timber, BR 443 §4.6.2)
- 12.5mm plasterboard
Closed-cell foam at BASF Walltite’s declared λ 0.025, measured at its thinnest point over the corrugations. The side panel is Corten (weathering) steel, taken at λ 50 like any mild steel (BR 443); its thickness makes no difference to the U-value. The battened service void gets BR 443’s batten bridge (11.8% timber) automatically.
Typical U-values for this construction
| Specification | U-value (W/m²K) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 50mm closed-cell foam | ≈ 0.42 | |
| 75mm closed-cell foam | ≈ 0.30 | |
| 100mm closed-cell foam | ≈ 0.23 | As pre-filled: meets the 0.26 limit |
| 125mm closed-cell foam | ≈ 0.19 | A self-build reported 0.2 for 125mm of the same foam |
| 100mm foam + a polythene VCL behind the service void | ≈ 0.23 | Same U-value; far less condensate (below) |
| 75mm PIR between 75mm timber studs on a 25mm gap, VCL | ≈ 0.36 | The studs bridge the boards through their full depth |
| 50mm foam + 50mm PIR between studs, VCL | ≈ 0.26 | Just misses 0.26 (0.263) |
| Insulated outside: 100mm PIR under ventilated timber cladding | ≈ 0.22 | The steel stays warm: the condensation check passes it |
Figures computed with the BS EN ISO 6946 combined method and BR 443 conventions — bridging, mortar joints in blockwork (and in solid brickwork where BR 443 §4.2 requires them) and the air-gap correction included — exactly as the pre-filled calculator works them out, with any pass or fail judged on the unrounded U-value. Indicative for the generic build-up shown: your products, thicknesses and (for floors) footprint will move the number, and that's what the calculator is for.
What changes the number
The corrugations and the frame are the conventions to settle. Foam sprayed onto corrugated steel is thickest in the troughs; U-Monkey takes it at its thinnest point, as BR 443 does where profile ribs compress insulation (§4.9.2, “at its thinnest point”, ignoring what spills into the ribs), and counts nothing for the air in the profile (as BR 443 §4.7.7 does for the troughs of a metal deck). The corner posts and the top and bottom rails are heavy steel sections that bridge the insulation in lines: they are linear thermal bridges, outside the U-value of the panel, and BS EN ISO 6946 leaves insulation penetrated by metal outside its method altogether (BR 443 §2) — so line a container with timber studs or battens, not steel ones. Thickness then does the work: 50mm of foam gives 0.42, 100mm 0.23, 125mm 0.19. Claimed figures are worth checking against that: a self-build container house sprayed with 125mm of the same foam reported about 0.2, which U-Monkey reproduces, while a container hotel was reported at 0.2 with 50mm, which it would take far more foam to achieve. To be lived in, a container has the figures of a new dwelling to meet — Approved Document L sets 0.26 for walls (Table 4.1), and the notional dwelling 0.18; a small detached garden office of up to 30m² with no sleeping accommodation can be exempt from most of the Building Regulations (Schedule 2, Class 6), though Part P still applies to electrics fed from the house (regulation 9(3)) — see the garden room pages.
Condensation in an insulated shipping container
U-Monkey’s free BS EN ISO 13788 check fails every row on this page that is insulated on the inside, because the steel skin is a vapour barrier on the cold side. With 100mm of closed-cell foam and nothing else, 271 g/m² of condensate is still in the wall at the end of the year (peak 307 g/m²); 125mm of foam leaves 219 g/m²; a sealed polythene vapour control layer behind the service void brings it down to about 30 g/m² a year, and PIR boards between timber studs behind a vapour control layer to about 6.5 g/m² — smaller, but still building up year on year, which the standard counts as a fail.
Two arrangements pass. Insulation outside the steel — 100mm of PIR under ventilated timber cladding passes with every assumed vapour value tested across its range, the steel taken with its laps unsealed. And inside, a foil vapour control layer about as tight as the steel: behind 100mm of foam, one rated at about sd 5,300 m or more passes even at a third of its rating, because almost no vapour then reaches the foam (U-Monkey does not count the trace the arithmetic leaves between two layers that tight). Whatever the insulation, seal the vapour control layer and every service penetration, and expect the steel frame members at the corners to stay colder than the panels: they are where surface condensation and mould show first.
Opens pre-filled. The condensation verdict sits just under the U-value — tap it for the full month-by-month check, the surface-mould (fRsi) check included. If it isn’t a pass, How to fix it tests the usual remedies on your build-up — a vapour control layer on the warm side, a more vapour-open layer on the cold side, more insulation to warm the inside surface — and applies the one you pick in a tap, with Undo.
Need it in writing for Building Control? The full condensation risk analysis report is £25 +VAT (£30 inc VAT), or included on Monkey Pro Unlimited — see an example report (PDF), or read what building control expects the analysis to show.
It is a screening to BS EN ISO 13788 (the Glaser method), honestly labelled as one: it does not model air leakage, rain or moisture stored in materials, so for high-risk or heritage constructions a full hygrothermal simulation (BS EN 15026) is the right next step. Figures above use the app’s defaults — Manchester (Ringway) climate, humidity class 3 (dwellings with high or unknown occupancy), a 1-in-10 design year and, on a roof, the surface taken 2 K below the air for night-sky cooling — so pick your nearest weather station for your own build-up: the result can change from one station to another.
Next: check the junctions
A U-value covers the flat area of an element — but heat also escapes where elements meet, and at modern U-values those junctions can be 20–30% of a dwelling's fabric heat loss. Now you know your U-values, model the junctions with the free ΨMonkey psi value calculator (no subscription; PDF reports £25 +VAT a junction):
Or read thermal bridging explained to see how junction Ψ-values feed your SAP calculation.
Frequently asked questions
What is the U-value of a shipping container wall?
A shipping container’s side wall lined with 100mm of closed-cell spray foam (BASF Walltite, λ 0.025), taken at its thinnest point, then a battened service void and plasterboard, has a U-value of about 0.23 W/m²K — inside the 0.26 limiting value for a new dwelling; 125mm gives 0.19 and 50mm only 0.42. The steel adds almost nothing to the U-value: its part in the calculation is to be vapour-tight on the cold side, and that is why U-Monkey’s condensation check fails every version on this page insulated on the inside — 271 g/m² of condensate is still in the wall at the end of the year with the foam alone, about 30 g/m² with a polythene vapour control layer added — and passes the same container insulated on the outside, or inside behind a sealed foil vapour control layer about as tight as the steel.
Does spray foam stop condensation in a shipping container?
It reduces it, but by the standard screening calculation it does not stop it. Closed-cell foam bonded to the steel leaves no air gap behind it and resists vapour (around μ 60), but the steel outside is completely vapour-tight, so any vapour that reaches it has nowhere to go: U-Monkey’s BS EN ISO 13788 check leaves 271 g/m² in a wall lined with 100mm of foam at the end of the year, and about 30 g/m² with a sealed polythene vapour control layer behind the service void as well — still a fail, because it builds up year on year. Two versions pass: insulation outside the container, under ventilated cladding, which keeps the steel warm; or a foil vapour control layer behind the foam rated at about sd 5,300 m or more and sealed at every lap and penetration, which seals the foam between two vapour-tight layers.
Is this calculator free?
Yes — building the element, reading the U-value, the compliance targets (including the Future Homes Standard), the condensation-risk screening check and the thermal-mass figures (decrement factor, time lag, κ) are all free in your browser, and the Building Control-ready PDF report is free too. No sign-up.
Does it follow the official calculation method?
Yes — the combined method of BS EN ISO 6946:2017 with BR 443 conventions, including timber bridging, mortar joints in blockwork (and in solid brickwork where BR 443 §4.2 requires them) and air-gap corrections, BS EN ISO 13370 for ground floors, suspended floors and basements, and ISO 13788 for the condensation screening check.
Other common build-ups
Walls
- U-value of a cavity wall with full-fill insulation
- U-value of a cavity wall with PIR partial-fill insulation
- U-value of a timber frame wall
- U-value of a solid brick wall with internal insulation
- U-value of a one-and-a-half-brick (327.5mm) solid wall
- U-value of a solid wall with external insulation
- What is the U-value of an uninsulated cavity wall?
- U-value of a timber frame wall with PIR insulation outside the studs
- U-value of a solid stone wall with internal insulation
- U-value of a cavity wall with external wall insulation
- U-value of a cavity wall with a dense concrete block inner leaf
- U-value of a solid brick wall (9-inch, uninsulated)
- U-value of a solid stone wall (uninsulated)
- U-value of a cavity wall after cavity wall insulation (blown wool or bead)
- Insulated plasterboard on a solid wall: what thickness reaches a U-value of 0.30?
- U-value of a solid wall battened out with insulation
- U-value of a dormer cheek wall (loft conversion)
- U-value of a garage conversion wall (insulating single-skin brick)
- U-value of a SIP wall (structural insulated panels)
- U-value of an ICF wall (insulating concrete formwork)
- U-value of a light steel frame wall (SFS)
- U-value of a timber frame wall with wood-fibre insulation
- U-value of an I-joist timber frame wall (Passivhaus-level)
- U-value of an extension cavity wall (what reaches 0.18)
- U-value of a wide cavity wall (200mm, 250mm, 300mm)
- U-value of wood-fibre internal wall insulation on a solid brick wall
- U-value of external wall insulation with mineral wool
- U-value of a knee wall in a loft conversion
- U-value of a party wall (0.0, 0.2 or 0.5)
- U-value of a basement wall (heated basement)
- U-value of a cellar wall when converting a cellar (basement conversion)
- U-value of a hempcrete wall (hemp-lime)
- U-value of a wall between a house and an integral garage
- U-value of a wall to an unheated corridor or stairwell in flats
- U-value of a CLT (cross-laminated timber) wall
- U-value of a straw bale wall
- U-value of a cob wall
- U-value of aerogel internal wall insulation
- U-value of wood-fibre external wall insulation (EWI) on a solid wall
- U-value of a log cabin wall
- U-value of a garden room (garden office) wall
- U-value of an SFS infill wall with rainscreen cladding
- U-value of a solid aircrete wall (thin-joint blockwork)
- U-value of a park home wall with external insulation
- U-value of the wall between a house and a conservatory
- U-value of calcium silicate internal wall insulation
- U-value of cork insulation on a solid wall
- U-value of insulating (thermal) plaster on a solid wall
- U-value of brick-slip external wall insulation
- U-value of a tile-hung wall
- U-value of built-up (twin-skin) metal wall cladding
- U-value of an insulated composite panel wall
- U-value of rainscreen cladding on a concrete or blockwork wall
- U-value of a precast concrete sandwich panel
Roofs
- U-value of 270mm loft insulation
- U-value of an uninsulated loft (a ceiling with no insulation)
- U-value of 100mm loft insulation (and what a top-up achieves)
- U-value of 400mm loft insulation
- U-value of insulation between rafters (loft conversion)
- U-value of insulation over the rafters (warm pitched roof)
- U-value of a room-in-roof sloping ceiling
- U-value of a warm flat roof
- Flat roof insulation thickness — about 150mm PIR for 0.15, 140mm for 0.16
- U-value of a cold flat roof (cold deck)
- U-value of an inverted flat roof
- U-value of an uninsulated flat roof (and a warm-deck upgrade)
- U-value of a room-in-roof flat ceiling (collar ceiling)
- U-value of a wood-fibre sarking roof (a vapour-open warm pitched roof)
- U-value of a solid (tiled) conservatory roof
- U-value of a boarded loft (loft boarding over insulation)
- U-value of a green roof (sedum or extensive green roof)
- U-value of a thatched roof
- U-value of spray foam insulation in a pitched roof
- U-value of a cold flat roof converted to a warm roof
- U-value of a garden room (garden office) roof
- U-value of a warm flat roof on a profiled metal deck
- U-value of a roof terrace with paving on pedestals
- U-value of a SIP roof (structural insulated panels)
- U-value of a ceiling insulated from below with insulated plasterboard
- U-value of a garage conversion roof (flat roof insulated from below)
- U-value of a warm flat roof on a concrete deck
- U-value of tapered roof insulation
- U-value of a mansard roof
- U-value of a built-up (twin-skin) metal roof
- U-value of an insulated composite roof panel
Floors
- U-value of an insulated concrete ground floor
- U-value of an insulated suspended timber floor
- U-value of a beam and block floor with PIR
- U-value of a ground floor with insulation below the slab
- U-value of a floor over a garage
- U-value of an uninsulated concrete ground floor
- U-value of an uninsulated suspended timber floor
- Underfloor heating on a ground floor: insulation and U-value
- U-value of insulation laid over an existing concrete floor
- U-value of a garage conversion floor
- U-value of a basement floor (heated basement)
- U-value of an extension floor (and the whole-house perimeter rule)
- U-value of an insulated raft foundation (EPS raft)
- U-value of a limecrete floor (insulated with foamed glass)
- U-value of a garden room (garden office) floor
- U-value of a solid floor with edge insulation
- U-value of a floor over an unheated cellar
- U-value of an exposed floor over a passage, undercroft or overhang
- U-value of a battened timber floor over a concrete slab
- U-value of a suspended timber floor insulated with wood fibre or sheep’s wool
- U-value of a concrete floor over a car park
- U-value of a warehouse floor slab
Different build-up? See the full wall U-value calculator, or start from scratch in the main U-value calculator.
Need the wider compliance picture? U-values feed straight into SAP calculations — or let our New Build Compliance Pack handle the lot. Background reading: what U-values actually are, and why two calculators can give different answers for the same wall.