SAP Calculations in London

A new home in London has to pass Part L like anywhere else — and then pass planning's own, tougher test on top. The London Plan asks major schemes for a 35% carbon cut beyond Building Regulations, many boroughs ask the same of a single new house, and the shortfall is paid for in cash. Here is how the two regimes fit together, borough by borough, and what to send us.

Two regimes on one set of numbers

Everywhere in England a new dwelling needs a SAP calculation to satisfy Part L — checked by Building Control, reported as the DER against the TER, finished off with an EPC. London adds a second regime that uses the same calculation for a different purpose. Under the Planning and Energy Act 2008, a planning authority may require development to exceed Building Regulations, and London’s does: the London Plan sets a carbon target above Part L and boroughs add their own on top. That is a planning condition, tested at application stage, not a Building Control matter.

So a London scheme usually needs the SAP run in two ways. Once as Building Control will see it. And once for the planners, staged through the London energy hierarchy — Be Lean (fabric and efficiency), Be Clean (heat networks and local energy), Be Green (on-site renewables), Be Seen (in-use monitoring) — to show what each step achieves against the baseline. The two submissions have to agree with each other. When they come from different people, they frequently don’t.

The London Plan: majors, 35%, and cash

London Plan Policy SI 2 requires major development — ten or more dwellings, a site of half a hectare or more, or 1,000 m² of other floorspace — to be net zero-carbon, and sets a minimum on-site reduction of at least 35% beyond Building Regulations. Since 1 January 2023 that baseline is Part L 2021, which made the 35% materially harder than the same figure was against Part L 2013. The GLA’s own guidance says residential schemes should be aiming for 50% or more.

Within the 35%, at least 10% for residential (15% non-residential) must come from energy-efficiency measures alone — the Be Lean stage — before renewables are counted. That rule exists to stop schemes buying compliance with solar panels on a leaky building.

Whatever is left between the on-site reduction and net zero is offset: a cash payment into the borough’s carbon offset fund, calculated on the residual tonnes of CO₂ per year over 30 years. The GLA’s recommended price is £95 per tonne, which comes to £2,850 per tonne of annual residual emissions — and several boroughs charge more (below). On a mid-sized scheme the offset payment is a line item worth designing against.

Major schemes also submit a full energy assessment to the GLA’s Energy Assessment Guidance, including the GLA Carbon Emissions Reporting Spreadsheet with SAP or BRUKL outputs at each stage of the hierarchy; must address overheating through the cooling hierarchy with TM59 modelling under Policy SI 4 (that is in addition to Part O at Building Control, not instead of it); and carry a Be Seen obligation to report in-use energy performance for at least five years after completion, normally through a Section 106 agreement. Schemes big enough to be referred to the Mayor — 150 homes or buildings over 30 m — add a whole-life carbon assessment.

Below ten homes: it depends on the borough

The London Plan’s 35% is written for majors. Nothing in it requires a scheme of six flats or one house to beat Part L. The borough’s Local Plan usually does, and the boroughs disagree with each other. The ones we can vouch for, as they stand in September 2026:

Two boroughs with a common boundary can want entirely different things from the same drawings. Tell us the borough before anything else.

What we do on a London job

Run the SAP as Building Control needs it. Run the Be Lean and Be Green scenarios and complete the GLA spreadsheet or the borough’s template. Write the energy statement, or the short-form version, to the borough’s own policy wording — see our energy statements service for the planning side in full. Tell you what the offset payment is likely to be while there is still time to reduce it. And keep one model behind all of it so the planning and Building Control submissions say the same thing.

London also puts more of your sites into Part O’s high-risk category — central and inner London postcodes have tighter glazing limits and a mandatory shading requirement — and the London Plan’s 105 litres per person per day water standard is tighter than Part G’s default. Both are on the Part O and London water calculation pages.

What is about to change

Two things, on two timetables.

The London Plan. A draft new London Plan was published on 16 July 2026; consultation runs to 15 October 2026, with adoption expected in early 2028. It abolishes the 35%-beyond-Part-L model and the carbon offset fund, replacing them with absolute targets under a new Policy GHR1: an energy use intensity of 40 kWh/m²/yr (35 aspirational) and a space heating demand of 20 kWh/m²/yr (15 aspirational) for homes, with five years of in-use reporting kept. Until adoption, the London Plan 2021 applies in full — and boroughs that already work in absolute terms, as Merton does, are ahead of it.

Building Regulations. The Future Homes Standard comes into force on 24 March 2027, with transitional cover for schemes submitted to Building Control before then and started by 24 March 2028. The GLA has not yet said how, or whether, the 35% will be rebased against it. We’ll tell you when it does.

Send the drawings and the borough — get a quote or call 01202 623236.

Common questions

Is a SAP calculation in London different from the rest of England?

The SAP itself is the same — Part L 2021, assessed for Building Control. What is different is that London planning runs a second test on the same numbers. The London Plan requires major developments to be net zero-carbon with at least a 35% on-site reduction beyond Part L, demonstrated in an energy statement at planning stage, and many boroughs apply their own version of that to schemes as small as one dwelling. So a London SAP usually has to be run twice over: once as Building Control sees it, and once as Be Lean and Be Green scenarios for the planners.

What is the 35% rule?

London Plan Policy SI 2 requires major development — ten or more dwellings, or a site of half a hectare — to achieve a minimum on-site reduction of at least 35% in regulated carbon emissions beyond Part L, measured against the Part L 2021 baseline for applications made since 1 January 2023. At least 10% of that must come from energy-efficiency measures alone for residential (15% non-residential). The GLA says residential schemes should be aiming for 50% or more. Whatever remains between 35% and net zero is offset with a cash payment to the borough.

How much is the carbon offset payment?

The GLA's recommended price is £95 per tonne of CO2 for 30 years — £2,850 per tonne of annual residual emissions — and most boroughs use it. Some do not: Lewisham charges £104, Merton £300, and Westminster £330 per tonne for electric and £880 for gas, all over 30 years. Fifteen more boroughs are reviewing their price. Check the borough's current figure, not the London Plan.

Does the 35% apply to a scheme of fewer than ten homes?

Not under the London Plan, which is written for major development. But it very often applies under the borough's own Local Plan. Merton and Wandsworth require 35% from minor residential schemes; Haringey requires them to be zero carbon; Camden requires an energy statement for every new-build dwelling. Other boroughs ask for nothing beyond Part L. Which borough you are in decides the answer, so tell us first.

What is an energy statement, and do I need one?

The planning document that shows how the scheme follows the London energy hierarchy — Be Lean, Be Clean, Be Green, Be Seen — and hits its carbon target. For major schemes it follows the GLA's Energy Assessment Guidance and includes the GLA Carbon Emissions Reporting Spreadsheet with SAP outputs at each stage. Boroughs set their own thresholds for smaller schemes, and several want a simplified template rather than a full statement. We produce both.

What is Be Seen?

The last step of the London energy hierarchy: monitoring. Major developments must report actual in-use energy performance to the GLA's portal every year for at least five years after completion, usually secured by a Section 106 agreement. It means the numbers in the energy statement get checked against reality, which is one reason the GLA wants them realistic.

Is London about to change the rules?

Yes. A draft new London Plan was published on 16 July 2026, with consultation to 15 October 2026 and adoption expected in early 2028. It drops the 35%-beyond-Part-L model and the offset fund in favour of absolute energy targets — 40 kWh/m²/yr energy use intensity and 20 kWh/m²/yr space heating demand for homes. Until it is adopted the London Plan 2021 applies in full. Separately, the Future Homes Standard comes into force for Building Control on 24 March 2027.

London scheme? Send the drawings and the borough.

We'll tell you which layer applies — Part L only, the London Plan, or a borough policy that goes further — run the SAP at Be Lean and Be Green, and fill in the GLA spreadsheet so the energy statement and the Building Control submission agree with each other.